Requirements

Purpose of Module Review Questions
Module Review Questions allow you to demonstrate your understanding of the module topics and to develop your critical thinking skills.

Required Research
In order to answer the questions, you will first engage in a process of scholarly research for the purpose of obtaining data that can be utilized to support your answers. Conduct in-depth research in the course textbook AND outside primary sources.

It is strongly recommended that you conduct research utilizing the ERAU Hunt Library. The Hunt Library contains a great amount of information on aviation and other topics. A benefit of utilizing the Hunt Library is the availability of the APA style citation/reference tool that is provided when conducting research utilizing the EAGLEsearch feature. This tool can automatically provide the proper APA style formats for citations and references.

FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS

• Scholarly paper
• Microsoft Word® (DOCX)
• Current APA style
  • 12 pt Times New Roman font
  • Double-spaced lines
  • Title Page
  • Page Headers on all pages
  • In-text Citations
  • Reference List page

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

• Paste each assignment question in BOLD font before each answer in the Body of the Text.
• Provide detailed data to answer ALL the questions fully.
• Conduct research using BOTH the course readings AND outside primary sources.
• Include terminology obtained from the research materials.

Overview

Research
Hunt Library’s (Links to an external site.) EAGLEsearch tool can automatically provide proper APA style format for citations and references.

APA Formatting
Course-Specific APA Style Instructions and Guidance

This Module Review assignment requires you to answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills.

Use the course textbook AND outside primary sources to obtain data that support your answers. Follow the guidelines in the Module Review Questions Requirements section, including using current APA style and pasting the questions in bold before each answer.

Questions

1. Companies create business records of many types and store the electronic files using an electronic records management (ERM) system. Explain why an ERM is a senior management issue and not simply an IT issue?
2. Describe each of the four V’s of data analytics: variety, volume, velocity, and veracity.
3. Identify the primary functions of a database and a data warehouse. Explain why enterprises need both of these data management technologies.

Your document submission is due by the posted due date. Your instructor will use the rubric for evaluating and grading your submission.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

 This assessment aligns with Module Objectives 1, 2, & 3 and Learning Outcomes 1, 3, & 4.

Rubric

MGMT 221 2.3 Module Review: Questions RubricsMGMT 221 2.3 Module Review: Questions RubricsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 ptsExcellent – The answers contained a VERY HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.22.5 ptsVery Good – The answers contained a HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.20.0 ptsSatisfactory – The answers contained a MODERATE level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.17.5 ptsNear Failing – The answers contained a LOW level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.0.0 ptsFailing – The answers contained NO coherent level of critical analysis.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent25.0 ptsExcellent – ALL of the questions were FULLY answered.22.5 ptsVery Good – ONE question was NOT FULLY answered.20.0 ptsSatisfactory – TWO questions were NOT FULLY answered.17.5 ptsNear Failing – THREE questions were NOT FULLY answered.0.0 ptsFailing – ONE answer was COMPLETELY missing.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy15.0 ptsExcellent – The answers are COMPLETELY accurate.14.0 ptsVery Good – The answers are MOSTLY accurate with ONE error.11.0 ptsSatisfactory – The answers are SOMEWHAT accurate with TWO errors.9.0 ptsNear Failing – The answers are SOMEWHAT inaccurate with MORE THAN TWO errors.0.0 ptsFailing – ALL answers are COMPLETELY inaccurate.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics15.0 ptsExcellent – ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.13.0 ptsVery Good – ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.11.0 ptsSatisfactory – SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.9.0 ptsNear Failing – SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.0.0 ptsFailing – MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Research10.0 ptsExcellent – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.9.0 ptsVery Good – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.8.0 ptsSatisfactory – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.7.0 ptsNear Failing – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.0.0 ptsFailing – NO evidence that scholarly research was conducted AND NO terminology from the source materials was presented.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style10.0 ptsExcellent – Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with NO errors.9.0 ptsVery Good – Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with ONE error.8.0 ptsSatisfactory – Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with TWO errors.7.0 ptsNear Failing – Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with THREE errors.0.0 ptsFailing – Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with MORE than THREE errors.10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0