Points: 100

Case Study 2: Software System Architecture

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Describe your chosen architecture pattern.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described your chosen architecture pattern.

Insufficiently described your chosen architecture pattern.

Partially described your chosen architecture pattern.

Satisfactorily described your chosen architecture pattern.

Thoroughly described your chosen architecture pattern.

2. Explain why you selected the architecture of this case study.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely explained why you selected the architecture of this case study.

Insufficiently explained why you selected the architecture of this case study.

Partially explained why you selected the architecture of this case study.

Satisfactorily explained why you selected the architecture of this case study.

Thoroughly explained why you selected the architecture of this case study.

3. Explain how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely explained how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

Insufficiently explained how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

Partially explained how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

Satisfactorily explained how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

Thoroughly explained how your chosen pattern could be applied to this case study.

4. Describe any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

Insufficiently described any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

Partially described any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

Satisfactorily described any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

Thoroughly described any shortcomings associated with your chosen architecture pattern for the case study.

5. Describe how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

Insufficiently described how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

Partially described how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

Satisfactorily described how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

Thoroughly described how your architecture could be implemented in hardware and software.

6. Develop a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely developed a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

Insufficiently developed a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

Partially developed a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

Satisfactorily developed a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

Thoroughly developed a UML diagram to document the architecture of the system through the use of Microsoft Visio or its open source alternative, Dia.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present