09.08.2019-528 views -History of Corrections
History of corrections
Correction System and Procedures
Aug 8, 2012
Comparison and contrast between Auburn and Pennsylvania correctional systems Comparability
The Auburn correctional program began with the New York Express Prison in 1819 and was termed as a congregate system. The Auburn beliefs were criminal offense prevention through silent confinement and anxiety about punishment. Inside the Auburn program inmates got and worked in groups during the day and returned to isolation through the night. Criminals with serious criminal activity were kept separated for the without any other inmate discussion or conversation. While getting confined the inmates were treated very well and provided adequate nourishment, but they got no possibility or probability of being relieved of their remoteness. This practice ultimately led to mental lack of stability, self-mutilations and suicides. The Pennsylvania system was a one system which forced inmates to be entirely separated from each other because of their entire jail sentence. This method was constructed with the belief that inmates could reflect on their lives, mistakes and realize the significance of discipline and appropriate patterns and function habits. While both the Pennsylvania and Auburn systems were similar and popular we were holding not globally recognized or accepted. The prisons operations for the two varied over the states due to the difference in social and economic conditions.
Another comparison between Pennsylvania and Auburn system was their strict perception in treatment and establishment of a consistent organized staff and strict military bearing, would be necessary for behavioral improvement. They the two believed the fact that correctional system would fill the emptiness left coming from misfortunes of family, faith, society and lack of education. The two devices also distributed the idea and objectives of manufacturing model citizens who could work skillfully, submissively and independently. The development in...
References: Banks, C. (2005). Treatment in America: A reference guide. NewYork ABC-CLIO. pp. 45-100
Manaworker, M. B. (2006) Prison supervision: problems and solutions. Gyan Publishing Home. pp. 91-120
Siegel, J., & Worrall. (2012). Requirements of lawbreaker justice. Boston: Boston: Cengage Learning (8th ed. ). pp. 5-30